Thursday, March 28, AD 2024 7:21pm

Agree to Disagree

pope-benedict-and-kids

There have been reports that in a phone call with the Pope, Obama told the Pope that they would have to “agee to disagree” on the issue of abortion.

The “disagreement” began last week with the Vatican reaction to the reversal of the Mexico City policy by the Obama administration.  Archbishop Rino Fisichella, President of the Pontifical Academy of Life, made very clear the Pope’s displeasure. 

Assuming that the reports about the “agree to disagree” remark are correct, I assume Obama has the Pope confused with many of the “pro-life” Catholics who voted for him last year, and who obviously have abortion low on their priority list.  My guess is that Pope Benedict will soon find ways to disabuse our pro-abort President of this misconception.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Donna V.
Donna V.
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 6:26am

I can agree to disagree with people about tastes in novels and movies. Ending a human life however,is a bit different than “you say tomato, I say tomatoe.”

Rick Lugari
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 7:30am

My guess is that Pope Benedict will soon find ways to disabuse our pro-abort President of this misconception.

I don’t know. What if Pope Benedict got a thrill going up his leg and come to see that the way to reduce abortion was to promote and facilitate it? That being pro-life has nothing to do with defending and upholding life. That the only doctrine we need is “Yes we can!”, that the theological virtues are now faith, hope, and change. I know it sounds silly, but as you point out it happened once or twice or twenty million times.

In fairness to Obama though, what could he have said? I mean, sure it would be nice if he converted, but frankly there’s no direct and honest way for him to respond – he’s literally having to answer to truth. So let’s just be grateful he didn’t respond by querying the Pope as to how many divisions he had…

Rick Lugari
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 8:09am

True, “open to dialogue” tends to disarm things and is actually a quite hollow gesture when dealing with fundamentals such as this. However, there’s a risk to saying it in this situation. No sooner would it have came out of his mouth, the Holy Father might have said, “Great, let’s have a call tomorrow morning where we can discuss the matter. – Tomorrow is no good for you, you say? How about Thursday between 9:00 AM and Noon or is between Noon and midnight better for you?”….

John Henry
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:05am

I tend to agree with Rick here. Benedict insists that ecumenical dialogue must involve a frank recognition of differences. It seems that Obama was simply paying Benedict XVI the courtesy of speaking clearly about their differences.

John Henry
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:06am

To be clear, I recognize that there are important differences between ecumenical and diplomatic contexts, but my opinion is that Benedict would probably favor directness in both.

Gerard E.
Gerard E.
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:07am

Would appear our President is a master of the fast quip. Telling the Holy Father that they will agree to disagree on abortion. Noting possible GOP opposition to stimulus packages, he responded, “I won.” Not to mention singling out Prof. Dr. Limbaugh as Someone That Republicans Should Not Listen To- forgetting a. they haven’t anyway and b. a superb means to rocket his ratings when Laura Ingraham and Michael Savage are now competing against him in that time period. We are happy to note that the Holy Father took the Americano bishops to the woodshed last April. Leading to the wonderful flow of bold pro-life statements through the balance of the campaign. Methinks he will have similar conversations with Mr. Obama.

John Henry
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:15am

Gerard E.,

I think you have correctly identified one of Obama’s potential weaknesses. Personally, I favor directness, but it can be perceived as ungracious (and, in some cases, is). It’s somewhat irritating that Obama is permitted to say stuff like “I won,” and get a pass. If Bush had made a similar remark, his ‘arrogance and intolerance for other’s viewpoints’ would have been fodder for articles for several years. Ah, well.

Matt McDonald
Matt McDonald
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:36am

I think there’s a subtle but less than venial difference between “we’ll have to agree to disagree” and an appropriate response of let’s continue to dialogue and try to work on those areas where we agree, or perhaps that we can at least work out a compromise. This is Obama’s big problem, he really isn’t willing to have open-minded dialogue, or compromise. THe Mexico City policy is the perfect example. A compromise with “life” would be to oppose restrictions on abortion but not to FORCE people to fund them…. He is not interested in compromise.

Michael Denton
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:47am

What’s interesting to me is that many pro-life Obama supporters used the argument that Obama was open to dialogue on the issue. That though there was disagreement there was a chance to change his mind. “Agree to disagree” is a significant rejection of that argument; it’s a declaration that he’s not going to shift. I’m glad for Obama’s honesty in this case; I wish his supporters shared the same virtue.

Rick Lugari
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 9:51am

Indeed Matt. Leaving the MCP in place really would do nothing to compromise Obama’s first principle on abortion (a woman’s right to choose to end the life of her child). Had he left it in tact and not do anything more to fund or promote abortion he could possibly claim some high ground as someone willing to compromise and/or demonstrate some good will concerning the oft-used, meaningless rhetoric of “nobody really likes abortion”. He has just shown his true colors, though they’re not a surprise to anyone, including his supporters.

Rick Lugari
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 10:00am

Oh, and Don. Love the picture you selected! It has such the “let the children come to me” thing going on. Really beautiful.

Rich Leonardi
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 11:20am

That picture is used by the USCCB for a series of terrific pro-life posters and brochures.

Matt McDonald
Matt McDonald
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 11:38am

Let’s give credit where credit is due:

Good news indeed:
House Dems Axe Birth Control Funds From Stimulus Bill – At Obama’s request

Eric Brown
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 2:08pm

I just read the same thing. It appears that he realizes that it will delay the passage of the bill, particularly in the Senate. So let’s thank God for the graces we get.

Donna V.
Donna V.
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 6:35pm

Wow. Over a “Big Hollywood,” a contributor has written a powerful piece arguing for life. And he knows what abortion is:

And I stand condemned. I’ve paid for three of them and was responsible for probably several more, I’m not really sure. But it breaks my heart. Because I’ve been convicted in my soul. It took years after the fact, but I was shown the Truth. And not to get mumbo-jumbo, oogly-boogly on you, but it was a spiritual awakening that did it. It happened unexpectedly, and it threw me to my knees in sudden tearful epiphany of what it meant for a man to be with a woman, what sex was really designed for by our Creator and… what abortion is.

His pro-life arguments are not new to us, but on a secular blog – he is going to get a massive amount of vitriol thrown at him in the comments section.

I rejoice. It looks like a Prodigal Son has returned home. One more set of eyes have been opened. May his piece will help to open someone elses eyes.

Donna V.
Donna V.
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 6:37pm

Here’s the link to that piece:

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/

Scroll down to “Flashpoint! A Woman’s Right to Choose” by Gary Graham.

Tito Edwards
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 6:41pm

Michael,

I am of the same mind. Unfortunately the Daily Kos/Huffpo crowd could care less about “dialogue”.

… I wish his supporters shared the same virtue. …

Donna V.
Donna V.
Tuesday, January 27, AD 2009 7:28pm

Donald, what heartens me is that I clicked on the author’s name and Gary Graham is a Hollywood producer and actor. I never heard of him but I don’t take that much interest in Hollywood (although I enjoy that blog, which is a place for conservative voices in Hollywood – all 10 of them.)

A Tinseltown hotshot, a former Don Juan, saw the light, repented, and is now a witness for the truth. Man, I love stories like that.

Matt McDonald
Matt McDonald
Thursday, January 29, AD 2009 8:39pm

“Pro-life” Democrat?

Sadly, Senator Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who claims to value life as much as his father did, voted once again to force taxpayers to promote abortion overseas. The Pennsylvania Senator used a lot of his capital as a so-called pro-life Democrat to help President Obama get elected. The question to all the pro-life groups that have lent him credibility on the issue is–how many strikes before Casey is out?

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top