Thursday, March 28, AD 2024 5:19pm

Chrysler UAW Workers Caught Drinking on the Job

Less than two months after President Obama visited the Jefferson North Assembly Plant in Detroit to highlight the billion dollar government bailout of Chrysler, Chrysler UAW workers were caught on tape drinking alcoholic beverages on a 30 minute lunch break.  Not to mention what looks like marijuana joints in between swigs of grog and then littering a public park with the empties.

That’s a nice liquid lunch… if it were a public holiday!

They have been suspended without pay by Chrysler.

Not surprisingly the UAW defended the actions of their union members basically saying “everybody does it” in society with a statement full of platitudes of citing company policy and nothing else.

Read the story by Jeff Bennett of the Wall Street Journal here.

Of course, what can a posting about beer drinking be without a “Weird Al” Yankovic song!

[Warning:  Video is rated PG-13 for being a satire to those that drink on the job]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
c matt
c matt
Friday, September 24, AD 2010 1:35pm

Given the future they have to look forward to under a government owned Chrysler, I can’t say I blame them.

Alex
Alex
Friday, September 24, AD 2010 2:06pm

Drinking beer at lunch? Not so bad… being drunk very bad… Smoking a jot ummm… WTF?? My stance is alcohol is fine only if not getting drunk or impairing the ability to perform. The Jot thing is a gov’t issue they should be going to jail it is illegal??? Although I do beleave we should legalize it .. still illegal at the moment… and doing that on the job is a def no no …

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Friday, September 24, AD 2010 2:08pm

It’s okay! They work for the government.

Tito Edwards
Friday, September 24, AD 2010 3:00pm

I worked for the government in a Summer internship during college, and boy this stuff is minor to what else occurs “on the job”!

Michael Denton
Friday, September 24, AD 2010 3:27pm

Yeah. Going out for a beer isn’t a big deal (as long as one isn’t impaired from doing one’s job or driving), but smoking joints and drinking a lot is a problem. While I doubt this means much for Obama, it is kinda embarrassing.

J Koebbe
J Koebbe
Friday, September 24, AD 2010 6:26pm

Think about this, If any one of those people in the video would have in anyway gotten hurt on the job and needed to go to the medical dept. in the plant, they would have been tested for drugs and alcohol!!! Wow if it should (would have)come back positive for either no workman’s comp. and immediate termination.
So who’s the fool here the drinking pot smoking workers or the UAW for protecting them?

I personally think if I where upper management in today’s UAW I’d vote to cut them loose from the union so that union could protect the image of the truly good loyal workers and to say the New UAW doesn’t tolerate that kind behavior any more!!!!!
How many people do you think would be happy to come work in this economy for 1/2 the pay those guy’s where making?????
I’m Proud to be an auto worker but not with fools like that.

Elaine Krewer
Admin
Saturday, September 25, AD 2010 1:47pm

Not to defend these workers for what they did — it was stupid and (as far as the pot smoking and littering) illegal — but… how is it that a bunch of blue collar workers drinking a beer or two at lunch is any worse than a bunch of white collar executives having a three-martini “business” lunch?

If they were not impaired in their ability to do their jobs, the beer drinking should not have been an issue. The pot smoking and the littering are another matter.

Mike Petrik
Mike Petrik
Saturday, September 25, AD 2010 3:45pm

Elaine, I agree. But for what it is worth drinking at lunch among white collar workers is pretty rare in most cities. Companies have policies against it, and customs have just changed.

RL
RL
Saturday, September 25, AD 2010 4:55pm

As Mike said, the days of a three martini lunch are pretty much history. Even if it weren’t I don’t think the comparison holds up. I worked in factories for over 20 years and have recently transitioned to a corporate job. The difference is that if someone in a factory is impaired or even a little off their game (overly tired, hangover, etc.) people can die or get maimed. The white collar guy might make a mistake that costs millions of dollars but at the end of the day everyone went home to their families. Not saying it’s okay for the white collar guy or trying to set a double standard, just pointing out that the consequences can be quite different.

The large modern factories are spectacular and the safety measures in place are very impressive, but they’re still not foolproof and never will be. One of the biggest challenges a factory supervisor faces is complacency. Trying not to keep people from taking safety (and quality, but that’s another story) for granted is a never ending battle. Someone pounding a couple tallboys or smoking a joint at lunch is just asking for trouble. We have a responsibility to not endanger our coworkers even if we’re too shortsighted about our own well-being. That is why these policies are in place and why they should be enforced. The unions should of course welcome rules like this, but they lost their way over a generation ago.

Donald R. McClarey
Admin
Saturday, September 25, AD 2010 4:59pm

When I was in college I spent a summer working on a die press in a truck body plant. I kept counting the ways people could lose fingers or limbs if someone got careless. Anyone doing that type of work high, drunk or hung over is just asking for a trip to the emergecy room for themselves and the people they work with.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top