Ah, but Klavan on the Culture, Conservatives, because of their ideas, are by definition always uncivil, while Liberals are always civil, at least according to the Mainstream Media, also known as the Media fewer and fewer people pay attention to. Ed Morrissey at Hot Air took a look at an example of this recently:
“Froma Harrop, a member of The [Providence] Journal’s editorial board and a syndicated columnist, has been named president of the National Conference of Editorial Writers. The NCEW is a 64-year-old professional organization. Its members include editorial writers, editors, broadcasters and online opinion writers. One of its new missions, the Civility Project, endeavors to improve the quality of political discourse.”–Providence Journal, April 15
Morrisey noted the above and then had this example of Harrop being civil in one of her columns:
“Make no mistake: The tea party Republicans have engaged in economic terrorism against the United States–threatening to blow up the economy if they don’t get what they want. And like the al-Qaida bombers, what they want is delusional: the dream of restoring some fantasy caliphate. . . . Americans are not supposed to negotiate with terrorists, but that’s what Obama has been doing. . . . That the Republican leadership couldn’t control a small group of ignoramuses in its ranks has brought disgrace on their party. But oddly, Obama’s passivity made it hard for responsible Republicans to control their destructive children. The GOP extremists would ask Obama for his firstborn, and he’d say, ‘OK.’ So they think, why not ask for his second-born, to which he responds, ‘Let’s talk.’ ”–Froma Harrop syndicated column, Aug. 2
That dig apparently annoyed Harrop, who responded on her own web site yesterday. Her explanation is, to say the least, entirely self-serving, and she twists the definition of “civility” into knots in order to explain her double standard:
I see incivility as not letting other people speak their piece. It’s not about offering strong opinions. If someone’s opinion is fact-based, then it is permissible in civil discourse. Of course, there are matters of delicacy, and I dispensed with all sweet talk in this particular column. And I did stoop to some ad hominem remarks, I’ll admit.
Orwell explained it all in Animal Farm long ago: Some animals are more equal than others.
Klavan always seems to be right on the mark.
I’m 100% with Obama and his adoring imbeciles’ civility “Big Lie.”
Re: liberals’ stark inability to be “civil”, it’s human nature. Naturally, one fears and loathes those who one is looting and raping.
They started the class war.
ROTFLMAO
[…] American Catholic. Share […]
Does this liberal media include News Corp?
The media as a whole is liberal because most in the business are liberal. Sometimes it’s so disgustingly blatant that it deserves attention like Newsweeks’ Bachmann cover. But many times it’s so minor or even imagined that whining about it makes right-wingers look like… well, liberals.
RR: I can accept constant comparisons to jihadis and genocidal mass murderers.
Comparing us to liberals goes “way over the line.”
FWIW I favor ridicule over whining.