Clinton E-Mail Depositions: Stephen Mull

Share on facebook
Facebook 0
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn 0
Share on reddit
Reddit 0
Share on delicious
Delicious
Share on digg
Digg
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon 0
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print

When it comes to the Clintons the normal rules that apply to the rest of us apparently do not apply to them.  For example, in a FOIA act lawsuit brought over the Clinton e-mails by Judicial Watch, a conservative group, Hillary Clinton’s chief of state Cheryl Mills was deposed and her deposition was videotaped.  Prior to Mills’ deposition, her lawyers requested that it not be released to the public, so it could not be used against Clinton for partisan political purposes.  In a bizarre ruling, Judge Emmet Sullivan agreed that the video of the depositions could not be released to the public, but that transcripts of the depositions could be released.  He then, sua sponte ( by the court’s unilateral action) made this decision applicable to all depositions taken in the case.

Legal suits, in most cases, are public matters.  The public normally has a right to access to the materials of such a lawsuit, absent matters that a court finds to be subject to some sort of legal privilege.  There is no legal privilege protecting materials in a lawsuit from being used for political purposes.

Fortunately Phelim McAleer, an independent filmmaker, is dramatizing the depositions.  Only the text of the depositions is used in the films.  McAleer is used to telling the stories the news media tries to ignore for political reasons.  He has just finished filming on a movie about abortionist Kermit Gosnell, who he describes as the most prolific serial killer in American history.  He is kickstarting his project to dramatize the Clinton e-mail depositons.  Go here if you wish to contribute.  I did.

The above video is the deposition of Stephen Mull, Executive Secretary of the State Department under Clinton.  As you can see from the video, he apparently has either a very lousy memory, or a very convenient one.  Go here to view the video of the deposition of Chery Mills.

More to explorer

8 Comments

  1. You would think she would have learned from Nixon. A dramatization can paint her in a worse light than the real video itself probably would. The filmmaker now has complete control over all nonverbal communication – tone, body language, gestures- which accounts for anywhere from 70-80% of communication. And the most important part of testimony – credibility – is almost 100% determined through nonverbal communication.

    Hope it rips her a new one.

  2. I wouldn’t be surprised if Phelim McAleer becomes the latest target for an IRS audit or investigation.

    Liberal gang bangers are a tight lot.
    They loot and shoot at any true patriot who is courageous enough to stand up to them.
    Phelim needs our prayers and support.
    I contributed to his films last week.

  3. Legal suits, in most cases, are public matters. The public normally has a right to access to the materials of such a lawsuit, absent matters that a court finds to be subject to some sort of legal privilege. There is no legal privilege protecting materials in a lawsuit from being used for political purposes.

    Certainly not when Barak Obama stands to benefit, there’s not, since pretty much the entirety of his entire political career prior to 2008 was predicated on leveraging just such materials.

  4. Quite right. Winning the Senate primary by getting the divorce records of his main Democrat rival who probably would have won the primary unsealed, and getting the Chicago Tribune to do the same to his Republican adversary in the general election. In both cases, both ex-wives opposed unsealing the records, and that should have been the end of it. However, the normal rules of law have never seemed to apply to Obama.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2075850/posts

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-0402280192feb28-story.html

  5. If you don’t conform to the Lefts ideology’s you are penalized. Examples;

    HHS mandate.
    So called Same Sex Marriage.
    Transgender bathroom edict.

    In each, the government fines, taxes or withholds funding if complete compliance isn’t maintained. The outcomes from Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor give me hope.

  6. the normal rules of law have never seemed to apply to Obama

    .
    Or the Clintons, or the Kennedys. Gee, I wonder what the common thread is there.
    .
    Besides the flagrant contempt for the law, I mean.

Comments are closed.