Cultural Appropriation

Share on facebook
Facebook 0
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn 0
Share on reddit
Reddit 0
Share on delicious
Delicious
Share on digg
Digg
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon 0
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on email
Email
Share on print
Print

Sheesh, Kathy Griffin is being condemned by everyone:

 

RAQQA, Syria — The self-proclaimed Islamic State has issued a statement condemning self-proclaimed comedian Kathy Griffin, accusing her of “cultural appropriation” after she posed for a photograph with a mock severed head of President Donald Trump.

The group, which has been protective of its brand ever since taking over vast swaths of Iraq and Syria and establishing itself as the premier beheading agency in the Middle East, said it was deeply disturbed by Griffin’s “ignorant and offensive” use of a “sacred Islamic State tradition.”

“This is just another example of a privileged white woman culturally appropriating the proud custom of a marginalized people. Beheadings are our thing, not your thing,” said the statement, which was released on Telegram.

Reports indicate that ISIS was at least somewhat relieved to see the swift and overwhelming backlash against Griffin on social media.

“Of course, the West’s social justice ‘warriors’ have always been our ally, and once again, they did not disappoint. We’re thankful that our fatwa friends immediately identified her offensive appropriation of one of our most cherished rituals,” said Aahil al-Raqqa, an executioner for the group.

According to sources close to the matter, it wasn’t simply Griffin’s portrayal of a beheading that was offensive, but also her lack of attention to detail to such a definitive aspect of ISIS culture.

 

Go here to read the rest.  The outraged Illuminati and the Elvis Impersonating Cattle Mutilators from planet Zorang should be heard from shortly.

More to explorer

Eating Their Own

  News that I missed, courtesy of The Babylon Bee:   WASHINGTON, D.C.—Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is busy celebrating her victory over the

5 Comments

  1. Oh please. Popping up with the pretend severed head of a well known person is not cool. She had to have known that. And if she didn’t, why not?

  2. Kathy Griffin is the tip of the liberal violence iceberg.

    I’m so old! I remember way back in October 2016 when, sure she had won the rigged election, corrupt, incompetent Hillary called Trump’s failure to pledge to accept the fixed outcome “a threat to our democracy.” Seems as if that was a symptom of psychological projection.

    All the democrat lies, e.g., the Russia collusion (whatever that is) myth have been repeated, expanded, exaggerated, repeated, and the vast left-wing fever swamp has worked up a fake Constitutional crisis.

  3. Speaking of cultural appropriation:
    June 4 On Eternal Word Television Network, Father Mitch Pacwa quoted St. John Paul II writing: “…the person is conceived.”
    President Abrahma Lincoln said: “One person cannot own another person.”
    Roe v. Wade, the abortion decision of 1973 disenfranchised every male human being ever created and endowed by “their Creator” with innate human rights. These endowed human rights become man’s unalienable civil rights. These civil rights are unalienable because these rights are innate human rights, endowed by “their Creator”.
    The innate and unalienable human right to every cell in their human body, created by “their Creator” for their human body, is in the eminent domain of the sovereign person. The human being is composed of human body and transcendent, metaphysical, rational, immortal soul. The human being’s rational soul is endowed with free will, intellect and sovereign personhood.
    Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen in his Life is Worth Living series: The Glory of Being an American explains who “We, the people” are. “We, the people” are a community of persons.
    If the person is conceived, then every human being is a sovereign person conceived in original innocence, a moral and legal innocence that is the standard of Justice for the state.
    The Blessed Virgin Mary who said at Lourdes: “I am the Immaculate Conception” acknowledges the original innocence into which she has been created before the fall of Adam at the request of the Word of God, when He said: “It is my desire to be among the sons of man.”, and indeed even after the fall of Adam, The Son of God kept His word and died as the Son of Man, to satisfy the debt of the Sons of Man.
    Therefore, the human being as a sovereign person who institutes the state is the sole proprietor of every human body part of his body, including the male seed of generation. The human male gives his seed to the ovum, not to the woman female human being, in a continuum of life, wherein the male human seed and the female human ovum become one new sovereign person, a new human being.
    Roe v. Wade, the abortion decision and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights of the United Nations have disenfranchised the male human being of his generative seed by giving ownership of the male seed to the female human being instead of to the ovum according to “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God”, “their Creator”. This miscarriage of truth empowers the female human being to become the owner of the male’s generative seed, which cannot be, since the male seed to unite and procreate another human being, another sovereign person is the purpose of its being, rather than the abuse of the seed for any other use. Donate eyes give sight, donate kidneys function according to their purpose, donate male generative seed must function according to its purpose and this purpose is to give our Constitutional Posterity, all future generations, life. The male seed’s purpose is to bring all future generations, our constitutional Posterity into being.
    As Dred Scott, Baby Roe and Terry Schindler Schiavo became wards of the court when their unalienable, innate human rights were disenfranchised, when the court ignored their constitutional human right to sovereign domain of their every human body cell, every male human being is now a ward of the court in Justice to have his sovereign right to his generative seed acknowledged and confirmed.
    The female human being and the feminists, as some choose to identify themselves, have every female, human virtue and strength of the sovereign person to live according to “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.”
    Secular humanism, the ideology, concedes all human rights to the state. Whereas, Thomas Jefferson wrote: “The rights the state gives, the state can take away.” Secular humanism makes the state the endower of human rights, instead of the guardian of human rights, as the sovereign persons of “We, the people” institute the state to be.
    Atheism denies “their Creator”, the endower of unalienable human rights, the Ninth and the Tenth Amendments. In denying the human being comprised of human body and transcendent soul, atheism denies the reverence and respect due to the human person, made in the image and likeness of God, made in free will and freedom. Atheism relegates the sovereign person’s domain to the state and some others of the state who are elected to adjudicate the true humanity of the human person. Instead of adjudicating the true humanity of sovereign persons, the state, through evil, has deformed the face of mankind by eliminating the sovereign Person of God from the public square, the Ten Commandments, God’s rules for human flourishing and preservation and “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God”.
    Embracing the power of the mighty, the state has made political correctness a new morality. Thus violating our Founding Principles: our UNANIMOUS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE and THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
    It is time to make AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. Relying on our Founding Principles, making AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, is not only possible, it is imperative.

  4. The unitive and the procreative purpose of human sexuality in the marital act are one. The unity expressed in the marital act is the unity of seed and ovum in the procreation o f another sovereign human being, another image of God in man, another brother and sister of Christ. Redefining the unity of the marital act as a stand alone purpose is the division and chaos of the evil one to cloud over the mind of man and seduce the sovereign person into hell. Do not go there.

  5. The sovereign soul of the newly begotten human person is endowed with free will, intellect and sovereign personhood. The human person is created equal, not born equal, and is endowed by “their Creator” with innate human rights that are unalienable human rights. Innate human rights become the civil rights to be guarded by the state instituted by the newly begotten human being, body and rational, immortal human soul from the very first existence of the living person; the living sovereign person whose original innocence, moral and legal innocence, are the standard of the virtue of perfect Justice for the state. These innate human rights are guaranteed by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.
    The newly begotten human soul gives life to the human body. The soul is the form of the body. If the soul leaves the body because the soul can no longer abide in the human body, death occurs. The child becomes a miscarriage or spontaneous abortion. The life of the child is proof of the act of the free will of the human soul to survive.
    The newly begotten human being, endowed in sovereign personhood and moral and legal innocence, procreates a mother of a woman and wife, and a father of a man and husband. Both offices, those of husband and wife and mother and father are offices to which informed consent is given by emancipated, adult human persons through the unitive and procreative marital act.
    With the procreation of mother and father, the newly begotten child establishes the family into which he will be born with both a man for a father and a woman for a mother, as “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God intend. The Declaration of Independence.
    Appropriation of our culture is stealing, lying and perjury in a court of law.
    Perjury in a court of law subsists in a male bride and a female husband, of those who cannot perform the marital act.
    Addiction to sodomy and the promise to be addicted to sodomy is not a civil right but a free will act contrary to “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God”. Homosexuality is an act of nature but not of man’s free will.

Comments are closed.