Tuesday, April 16, AD 2024 2:14pm

What The Week Long LeBron James Ego Charade Can Tell Us About The State Of the World, As Well As The Catholic Church

UPDATE  Check Back On Monday To See What Time The Scheduled Appearance On The Al Kresta Show Will Take Place. Al Kresta Is Heard On EWTN Radio ( Over 100 Affiliate Stations) Check Your Local Listings Or Click Here To Listen Live

The LeBron James saga was particularly painful for those of us who live in Ohio and are Cavaliers fans. However a cursory glance at some of the national columnist’s reaction, to the week-long ego charade broadcasted by ESPN, gives me hope that many others have seen through this smoke screen as well. (Check these columns here here and  here.) What we witnessed Thursday night and the excuses made for it, along with sucking up by some of the national powers that be, gives us some insight on a world full of instant gratification and the desire to party on in South Beach, rather than roll up their sleeves in places like Cleveland. Talk about a metaphor for the Catholic Church.

For years now many faithful orthodox minded Catholics have painfully watched friends and loved ones leave the Catholic Church for either the local hoopty do mega church (Mother Angelica’s words,) or for no church at all, claiming they needed to feel better. They didn’t like a Church who couldn’t get with the times, had too many sinners in the pulpit, or talked to much about sin and not enough about heaven. Perhaps the LeBron James fiasco has given us the perfect recipe for what we should do; give it right back to them.

I grew in a small town (or city depending upon your classification) full of hard working class folks (and farmers who came into town from the outlying areas) where flowery words were few and far between and one would be easily called out for his actions. Now we all know the Church has had some difficult times in the last few years. However, this is because we wanted to be liked, instead of doing it God’s way, whether that was politically correct or not.

Today we have a new crop of orthodox-minded young seminarians, priests and women religious who are pious, but not above calling people out concerning their phony excuses for not taking their Faith more serious by not practicing it, or leaving it all together. In my book, The Tide is Turning Toward Catholicism, I outline the increase in vocations, especially in dioceses which are more openly orthodox in their approach. The Father McBrien’s and Kung’s of the world are being replaced by younger versions of Father Corapi and Father Pacwa. Though these two priests have different approaches, they are not above calling out the phony reality show world we often seem to celebrate in our culture and religion.

For months, but especially in the last couple of weeks, the speculation on where LeBron James would play professional basketball next year was endless. Instead of handling it the way every other player does, by weighing prospective offers, James extended his stated time by another week, just enough time to have ESPN broadcast a full hour special at the national Headquarters of the Boys and Girls Club, so as to appear to be quite the humanitarian. I don’t know whose idea it was to have children as props, but they certainly outdid themselves in unseemliness.

LeBron James never notified Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert of his decision, he simply announced it live on the air. Loyal Cleveland fans, who have experienced a lifetime of having the rug pulled out from under them, were left to dangle in the wind, so much for the promises of bringing them a champion. I am not sure what was worse hearing that or the crocodile tears given by pundits who said they felt bad for the poor people of Ohio who just can’t buy a break with their decrepit economy and professional sports franchises. Adding insult to injury was ESPN commentator Stewart Scott, who treated LeBron James like a 12 year old girl would have the Bay City Rollers circa 1976.

I immediately thought of those same folks in the mainstream media who throw the Catholic Church their own false pity by saying, “I feel sorry for Catholics, if only their Church would get with the times and allow people to do what they want, or allow priests to marry, maybe then good things would happen.” It has already been tried and the liberal Protestant Churches, especially the Episcopal Church, are in complete free fall. For more this read my article entitled; If You Want The Political Left To Run Governments, Look At What It has Done To Religion (Left It In Tatters.)

For those who live in growth areas and can’t understand what all the fuss is about with these Cleveland fans; keep this in mind; Cleveland, as has much of northern Ohio, has lost half of their population since 1950. Loyalty is a key ingredient here, which is why the former Browns quarterback Bernie Kosar was so popular. Though he played his college football at Miami, he relished the chance to come home. Much of America has no problem with transience. However, 50% of Americans live within 50 miles of where they grew up. Growing up in Ohio during the 1970s and 1980s, along with working for Church via Catholic schools for the last 20 or so years, I could rattle off a barrage of Cliff Clavin style statistics of schools and churches that have closed. However, I won’t bore you with it, suffice it to say, there are fewer churches and schools than their once was. On the flip side, just the opposite is true in places like Florida where they seemingly had trouble for years keeping up with the demand for churches and schools.

What gave me cause for joy, on this sad day for many Cavaliers fans, was the instant reaction of some, especially in the print media to the LeBron charade. They didn’t mince words and called it for what it was, a sad spectacle of egos run amok along with those who continue to coddle LeBron James. The Church, and I mean the clergy (especially the hierarchy) and the laity should take the same blunt approach as some of those sportswriters who called out LeBron James.

All too often Catholics have held back from criticizing those liberal dissidents in the Church who needed it. In addition we often let some of those phonies who left the Church, and made fun of us once they left, off the hook. They wanted to run away to a an entertainment themed mega church devoid of religious images and symbols, where “it’s all good” and everyone is saved and goes to heaven. None of this is found in the Bible and actually, quite the opposite is true (Matthew 7:21-23.) Jesus, the Apostles and Saints, along with the Church Fathers, have given us Sacred Scripture & Sacred Tradition. In addition, Jesus gave us the most personal of gifts, the sacraments, especially the Eucharist. If this isn’t good enough for us, heaven help us!

If one thinks I am being a bit harsh or upset, perhaps they should read what St. Ireneaus or St John Chrysostom wrote about those in the Church (bishops included) who wanted the easy way out, wanting to be linked, instead of rolling up their sleeves. Keep in mind their blunt words were often given when being a Christian was good cause for a gruesome death at the hands of the powers that be.

My first approach with those who come after the Church is always the kinder, gentler approach. However, the reality of where I grew up has taught me that the blunt approach taken by Jesus and the Early Church Fathers is far better second or third option, compared to what many of those who are politically correct in the Church recommend today. I do sense that many more in the Church are taking the more direct approach favored by Jesus, the Apostles and Saints along with the Early Church Fathers. Never forget, that the Truth will set us free, whether it is popular or not.

Dave Hartline

0 0 votes
Article Rating
20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
restrainedradical
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 1:45am

LeBron will be lucky to get any contracts to endorse anything outside of Miami. The last athlete to fall this hard was OJ Simpson. No good comes from stabbing people in the back.

afl
afl
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 5:31am

Strange the comments were about Lebron and not the comparing of the event to so called ‘catholics” in the pew, who have forgotten or have been swayed by the glitter of change and culture. They have forgot or never understood, our Lord did not give us rules that were elective in nature, but tenets that were set for all eternity regardless of occurences or changes in our world and scripture that fully explain what occurs when we forget that fact.

Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 7:35am

I read the letter to the Cavs fans by the owner guaranteeing that the team will win a title before LeBron does. If that happens, he’ll be left feeling like the Prodigal Son, ashamed of himself for letting greed and glitter get the best of him.

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 8:00am

Lebron who?

re: getting people back on the road to eternal life. The Pelosi-Obama-Reid regime may be a blessing in disguise. Tens of millions of unintended consequences of their misrule and the devastations of the economy and our way of life may bring people to realize that this glitzy world is a chimera and their true home is Holy Mother Church and in Heaven after repenting, confessing, doing penance, amending their lives and through good works glorifying Almighty God, through Jesus Christ, Our Lord and Savior, in the Unity of the Holy Spirit.

Jay Anderson
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 8:53am

Goodbye Clevland.
Turn down the rock and roll
Turn out the light.
Goodbye Clevland.
Goodbye, Good luck and goodnight.

~ Robert Earl Keen

c matt
c matt
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 2:19pm

Sorry, I have not been following the Lebron thing, and don’t follow basketball in general. But I don’t see much of a comparison between Lebron and the state of the Catholic Church.

Lebron left because apparently he believes the Cleveland team is not good enough to win a championship. He decided that winning one was important to him , so he left for team that he thinks could get him there (an he could get them there). Has Lebron played for several teams for short periods of time? Has he hopped around a lot (I don’t know)?
I can’t blame him – how many of us would leave their current job for one they felt was better (either better pay or better conditions, or maybe both?)? More importantly, how many of our employers would keep us around if we started sucking at our job? How long would the Cavs have kept Lebron if he suddenly started to suck (and how many fans would be clamouring for him to be cut)? Loyalty is a two way street my friend, and Big Sports, like any other big business treats it one way only.

In the end, Lebron’s situation is an employee/employer one, not anything having to do with loyalty to one’s faith (employer/ee loyatly died decades ago). Just completely different situations.

Joe Hargrave
Friday, July 9, AD 2010 5:29pm

LeBron who indeed.

What an appalling waste of time, energy, effort, talent, and other human resources, speculating about the fate of a ball tosser.

Enjoy it on your own time, have a beer, cheer when your team scores, boo when the other guys do, fine. To get this involved in a sports game and a sports figure is… I can’t use the word I’d like to use, but it begins with f, ends with ing, and is followed by ridiculous.

Our Church is in crisis, and our government is out of control. Our southern border is menaced by marauders, Europe is being overrun by Islam, and the US is on the verge of another Great Depression.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19205.htm

“If the world is unwilling to continue to accumulate dollars, the US will not be able to finance its trade deficit or its budget deficit. As both are seriously out of balance, the implication is for yet more decline in the dollar’s exchange value and a sharp rise in prices.”

Worry about that. Not where some ball player decides to continue putting the ball in the net.

Joe Hargrave
Saturday, July 10, AD 2010 5:22pm

Dave,

You certainly make some valid points. But this goes too far:

“The LeBron James saga was particularly painful for those of us who live in Ohio and are Cavaliers fans.”

Painful? Really? It caused you pain?

St. Paul may have used sports analogies (where was this exactly?), but he never endorsed the gladiator games at the Colosseum. I’m not saying you endorsed the modern equivalent, but when I look at the madness that overcomes sports crowds – especially in a time of political, economic and social crisis – I don’t see a bunch of regular people enjoying sports.

I see the bread and circuses of Rome, with which the people were distracted while civilization collapsed. A pacifier, a placater, a sedative – followed by irrational emotional outbursts and torrents of rage, all directed at some ridiculous non-event instead of at the people who are imposing a new tyranny upon us.

I agree fully with the need to relate to people and their interests. I’m no ivory tower intellectual, I detest alienating and obtuse language, esoteric jargon, etc. But at a certain point, people do need to be slapped in the face with the truth, and they need to be told bluntly that every second of real and genuine PASSION they waste on a sports figure subtracts from the struggle they could be mounting against the growing threat to our liberties and security as citizens.

Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Saturday, July 10, AD 2010 11:24pm

Since we’re engaged in a spiritual battle for souls, it’s only fitting that sports analogies be used. The recent firing of the Catholic professor at the University of Illinois is one example of the intelligentsia putting down the “small people” for wanting to take the path that is hard and narrow but leads to life in Christ rather than the path that is wide and easy but leads to destruction–or in the case of the French soccer players who don’t do hard work, a trip back home in coach class.

Joe Hargrave
Sunday, July 11, AD 2010 1:03am

Dave,

On your personal pain: different strokes, I suppose. But you didn’t quantify it originally. A “small” amount of pain is fine. The utter grief that some appear to be going through is, in my view, a disproportionate response.

You say of the bread & circuses argument:

“it just doesn’t make sense”

Well, it does make sense, and you don’t seem to be arguing against the “sense” of it as much as you are its mere existence.

” The Roman population was by and large illiterate and caught up in violence and warfare.”

Our population isn’t illiterate by Roman standards, but it is less educated by the standards of the developed world. And there is plenty of apathy to go around, even if people have basic reading skills.

As for violence, have you paid no notice of our sex and violence saturated entertainment “culture”? It’s everywhere, it’s a constant feed of increasingly horrific stimuli.

“Are your really saying that modern sports fans want to see others torn apart in their local stadiums?”

The rioting that takes place on occasion suggests that at least some are. So is the immense popularity of professional wrestling, “ultimate fighting championship”, and other increasingly bloody “sports” contests.

In any case, the main argument is that people are distracted. I don’t have to prove that they are violent, or potentially violent, in order to show that they are investing time and resources in sports that would better be invested in politics.

Frankly I think the American founders would be horrified at the cult of sports in this nation. Entertainment, or what the founders in their classical republican worldview called luxury, was considered to be the enemy of moral AND civic virtue. The extent to which the people indulge in games and vices is the extent to which they diminish as the sort of responsible citizens that a free republic needs to exist.

As for Europe: I couldn’t care less. I’m not hung up on Europe, I don’t idolize Europe. I don’t see the relevance.

Please don’t compare me to Al Gore. I don’t want to bore people with lectures. But as student of Aristotle’s “middle way”, I recognize that there is another extreme we want to avoid, which is hyping people with meaningless distractions.

We have to appeal to both the passions and the intellect. In fact I’m much more about appealing to passions right now than I am intellect, because many issues are over-intellectualized. But I want to direct that passion AWAY from sports and entertainment, and TOWARDS politics. Politics can be as passionate and competitive as any game or any concert – and it is precisely because of this truth that these other distractions are dangled before the people.

So I think you misunderstand my aim, especially when you ask,

“Joe, do you really think the problems in the Church and the world of politics would be solved if everyone was as smart as you think they should be?”

It is NOT about intelligence, so no, I absolutely do not think that. What I think is that people, regardless of their intellectual abilities, should care more about politics than they do sports or the media-created popular culture. One does not need intellect to participate in politics, any more than they do religion.

” Even if everyone watched TV news, read a plethora of newspapers and websites; the problems would remain.”

I submit that they would be less severe with a politically active populace, and this was the unanimous opinion of the founders of this republic. This is what self-governance means. This is what liberty requires. Slavery and oppression are the defaults of this fallen world; freedom is rare and must be actively fought for and maintained.

“Perhaps this is why the late WIlliam F Buckley said he would rather be goverened by the first 1,000 names in the Boston Phone book, than by the Harvard Faculty.”

I think he said it because the elites at Harvard, moreso now than even in his day, are self-hating, self-destructive, and isolated from the people. I agree with his sentiment entirely – but in order to govern, those 1,000 names would have to put down the beer and the remote.

It is precisely because I DON’T want an elite to run our lives that I DO want the people to stop focusing on nonsense and become better citizens. Don’t you see that? You can’t just say that sovereignty lies with the people, and expect it to stay that way without their involvement. If the people don’t exercise their power, others – the elites – will do it for them. Nature abhors a vacuum. If the people create one through the abrogation of self-government, then the masters will step right back into their comfortable position.

It is vital that you and others understand this.

Joe Hargrave
Sunday, July 11, AD 2010 1:13pm

Dave,

I wasn’t aware that there was only one point – I tried to address all of your points.

“However, that doesn’t mean that all of the problems will be solved if we all get involved.”

Who said it meant that? Certainly not I.

And it just doesn’t matter. See, I think you’re missing the point with things like that. It doesn’t matter whether or not all problems will be solved, such a guarantee is not and never should be the requisite of political participation – the bottom line is that no problems at all will even be addressed by an inactive citizenry. That’s certainly what the elite wants.

You say I don’t understand your argument about sports. I submit to you that I do understand it, and disagree with it.

“There is a big difference between that and the field of athletic competition.”

Insofar as both serve as a distraction from issues that matter, there is no difference. Other differences may exist, but they are not relevant to me.

“Do you really think the nation would have been better served with the likes of Governor Dewey, Vice President Mondale and Vice President Gore?”

Why are you asking me this? I invite you to read my previous post for the answer to this question. Carefully, perhaps, this time.

“ccording to your line of thinking the state of Vermont and the US citiies of Cambridge, Massachusetts, Berkeley, California and the Dutch city of Amsterdam would be the greatest places to live, because they have one of the highest civic participation rates in the world.”

I’m not sure what “civic participation rate” is, or measures – you can break that down for me if you like.

Joe Hargrave
Sunday, July 11, AD 2010 11:20pm

Dave,

You’re simply wrong. I don’t know if it is a logical or a rhetorical issue. Only you do.

“However, to say that sports and entertainment holds too much sway on our society is bordering on nanny statism and eggheaded pontification.”

It really is no such thing at all. Stating what I believe to be a mere fact in no way necessitates a nanny-state, and it is hardly an observation limited to the ivory tower.

I could just as well say that ignoring the sway that these forces hold over society is to engage in bad citizenship and willful ignorance – but I don’t.

To fail to participate is NOT an intellectual failure – IT IS A MORAL FAILURE. All but the mentally handicapped are culpable for their moral choices, regardless of their intellect.

So you’re really barking up the wrong tree with this constant accusation of eggheadery. If intellect is the requisite for voting, then we have no business with a democracy or even a republic – we need Plato’s philosopher king. But it isn’t. It is virtue, not intellect, that is the primary requisite for voting. It is a free choice made by individuals, and not innate abilities, that is responsible for this decision.

Now, if you don’t get my clearly stated point this time, what else can I conclude other than that you’re making excuses for people’s civic sloth?

” if Broadway, Hollywood, Major League Baseball, the World Cup and the National Football League and college football took the rest of the year off, and everyone went to town hall meetings to resolve the various problems plaguing our country and world, the world would be a better place.”

Language is key. I absolutely believe it would be a “better” place – I don’t think it would become a perfect place, a utopia with no problems. It might be a little bit better, it might be a whole lot better – participation isn’t the only thing that makes a society bad or good. But I’d submit that while it is not sufficient for a good society, it is necessary.

If it WOULDN’T make society a better place, then it is nothing but a baby’s pacifier granted by the elites to their stupid pets, serving no actual good and right purpose. It would have no rational justification, even if it can be said that voting is, or is the result of, a natural right.

Is there a rational justification for universal suffrage, or is it just a societal ornament? If there is a rational justification for it, then we can only conclude that a widespread failure to use that right is irrational.

“I am an optimist. However, I am a realist as well. Some people just don’t care and some people who claim they care, just want to control others.”

But this is all off the main point.

Here’s my question to you – is it your view that invoking the drama of LeBron James will politically galvanize folks who otherwise wouldn’t pay attention to anything? They’ll make the transition from sports to politics this way?

If that happens, and it works, I’ll eat my shoes with ketchup. In all seriousness, I’d be interested to know if that works, or if it ever has. If it has, I say, go with what works.

” What I meant was voting participation and membership in civic clubs, neighborhoood groups, school organizations etc.”

Those are all good things in themselves. It is unfortunate that secular leftists would seem, if your claim is accurate, to have a leg up in that department, since the vision of the founders was for this to be a universal phenomenon.

I also have no problem with Vermont. I like their gun laws more than I dislike Bernie Sanders. And I say, ultimately, that power belongs to those who take it. Within our political system, Christians have the means to become just as involved, and have their values just as represented. It is simply irrational for them to cede the arena to hostile forces.

“What I am trying to say is that not everyone does what they should.”

For goodness sakes, you say that as if it is novel. Who the heck argued otherwise?

But does this fact somehow absolve us of a responsibility to proclaim the truth, to proclaim what ought to be done? Again, I am with Aristotle. There are two extremes – there is pie-in-the-sky idealism on the one hand, that says anything is possible and people are capable of anything. Then there is fatalism – the view that things are what they are and cannot be changed.

The rational, position is genuine realism – understanding what can be changed, and what cannot be changed. Understanding what can be influenced, and what cannot. Understanding what your power is, and what the limit of that power is.

Your view, to me, is closer to fatalism than realism. The Church proclaims that civic participation is a moral obligation. It doesn’t matter if “people don’t do what they should” – people shouldn’t have abortions either, but the Church will never cease to proclaim that it is wrong, and that they should choose life.

So I will continue to proclaim, along with the Church, and in the spirit of the American founders, the importance of civic virtue and I will continue to denounce those influences that weaken and corrupt it.

“Joe, I think we can agree that we should all be more involved in Church & State affairs. However, trying to tell people that sports and entertainment should be severely curtailed when so many of our saints and Holy Fathers were involved with both sounds a bit over the top.”

This is your problem – I said no such thing. When did I say “severely curtailed”? This was a false inference, or, poor choice of words. A fallacy or a gaffe.

I do not propose to infringe upon ANYONE’s right to be a lazy idiot. But I certainly do propose that we use our first amendment rights to remind people of their moral and civic obligations, and to denounce the garbage that obstructs them.

Do you understand that it is possible to oppose a thing without violating another person’s right to that thing? If so, then we have no quarrel, sir.

Elaine Krewer
Admin
Monday, July 12, AD 2010 7:22am

Over on another blog I found a list of humorous Twitter responses to the LeBron James announcement…. among them was the following:

“I wanted to announce my Second Coming at 9 p.m. tonite, but it looks like you all had other plans — Jesus Christ.”

Chris Russo
Tuesday, July 13, AD 2010 6:15pm

LeBron James had every right to leave Cleveland. You talk about his “week-long ego charade” but that entire week LeBron said very little to the media. LeBron made no appearances on ESPN or any other network until his special. You’re blaming LeBron for the fact that everyone on TV was talking about him non-stop. Further more you failed to mention the fact that LeBron’s marketing firm agreed to only do the special if the sponsorship dollars would go to The Boys and Girls Club.

The reason so many people have left the church isn’t because they want some razzle-dazzle experience when they go to church. No, it’s because of the fact that for the last sixty plus years a small portion of priests and clergy members have been raping and sexually exploiting children around the world. Every clergy member who ever abused a child and every church official who covered it up and didn’t report these people to the authorities should be thrown in jail. So before you start criticizing completely innocent and upstanding athletes clean up your church first.

Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Wednesday, July 14, AD 2010 7:00am

Chris Russo, then how do you account for the fact that many fans are quick to forgive and forget the sins of the Kobe Bryants and Tiger Woods of the world rather than ditch them? I don’t see that happening for the priests who betray their flock, so that says a lot about the effect of pop culture’s alluring but false promises of fame and riches on society, especially those who build their homes on shifting sand rather than rocks. Perhaps LeBron may be like the Prodigal Son and find that his ego got the best of him.

Thankfully there are many other priests to do us Catholics proud, including superstars like Archbishop Raymond Burke, who certainly wouldn’t pull a LeBron act despite the Creative Minority Report humorously imagining such a possibility: http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/search?q=LeBron

Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Pax Christi of Bakersfield, CA
Thursday, July 22, AD 2010 11:00pm

ESPN’s ombudsman vindicates Dave, blasting the network for its LeBron coverage: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/post/ESPN-ombudsman-blasts-network-for-LeBron-coverag?urn=top-257681

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top