Friday, March 29, AD 2024 2:19am

Notre Dame Faculty Attacks Bishop Jenky

 

In a prior post, which may be read here, I detailed a speech by Bishop Daniel Jenky of the Peoria Diocese, my Bishop,  in which he blasted the attack of the Obama administration on religious liberty.  Bishop Jenky is a graduate of Notre Dame and was ordained as a priest of the Congregation of Holy Cross, the Catholic religious order which runs Notre Dame.  Bishop Jenky is quite fond of Notre Dame and often speaks of his days there.  He serves on the Board of Fellows of Notre Dame.  Professor Charles E. Rice, Law School Professor Emeritus at Notre Dame, details what happened at Notre Dame after Bishop Jenky’s speech:

On April 14, Bishop Daniel R. Jenky, C.S.C., of Peoria, Illinois, delivered a courageous homily at Mass during “A Call to Catholic Men of Faith.”  Bishop Jenky said, “This fall, every practicing Catholic must vote, and must vote their Catholic consciences, or by the following fall our Catholic schools, our Catholic hospitals, our Catholic Newman Centers, all our public ministries—only excepting our church buildings—could easily be shut down.  Because no Catholic institution, under any circumstance, can ever cooperate with the intrinsic evil of killing innocent human life in the womb.”

Forty-nine members of the Notre Dame faculty denounced Bishop Jenky in a Letter to the  University President, Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Richard C. Notebaert.  The Letter called on them to “definitively distance Notre Dame from Bishop Jenky’s incendiary statement.”  The signers, said the Letter, “feel” that Bishop Jenky should resign from the University’s Board of Fellows.

The faculty Letter claims that Bishop Jenky “described President Obama as ‘seem[ing] intent on following a similar path’ to Hitler and Stalin.”  They accuse Bishop Jenky of “ ignorance of history, insensitivity to victims of genocide, and absence of judgment.”  The astonishingly simplistic and defamatory character of those accusations can be appreciated only by looking at what Bishop Jenky actually said:

Go here to the Cardinal Newman Society blog to read the rest.  To anyone who has been paying attention to Notre Dame over the past few decades, especially to “Obama Worship Day” in 2009, the faculty letter will come as no surprise.  When it comes to choosing between Obama and the teachings of the Catholic Church, it isn’t even close in the minds of many of the faculty and powers that be at a university dedicated to Our Lady.  As I have noted, here, 2012 is not merely an election year for American Catholics, but an Elijah on Mount Carmel year.  A time of choosing is upon us, and many of the Notre Dame faculty have made their choice crystal clear.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sr. Colleen Clair, FMA
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 6:33am

If I were Jenky, I would distance myself from Notre Dame…weren’t they the “Catholic” university that invited Obama to speak? Their Catholicity is questionable in my mind.

Don Morgn
Don Morgn
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 6:58am

Notre Dame faculty and the American people condemn Bishop Jenky because of his hate speech. Name calling is not a positive or helpful method of communication. Think of all the terrible things the Bishop,the Pope and other Catholics have and can be called and you will realize the error of his ways.

Paul W Primavera
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:11am

It is NOT hate speech to condemn abortion, contraception, fornication, adultery, and homosexual activity. This is essentially what St. Paul did in 1st Corinthians 6:9-10. For his efforts the Romans beheaded him. Who really was hateful?

WK Aiken
WK Aiken
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:31am

So, Don-who-needs-to-buy-a-vowel, by that same logic, you’d say Jesus was crucified for His “hate speech.”

‘Nuff said, I think.

Mandy P.
Mandy P.
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:38am

I hope the good Bishop tells these folks to pound sand.

Paul W Primavera
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:39am

Jesus did engage in hate speech – against idolatry, depravity, perversion and every sort of sinful wickedness. He was quite pointed with all the “right thinking people” of his day – Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes, etc. – who thought just like today’s well educated liberals that they “knew” what was good for everybody. Indeed, those who love sin cannot stand the kind of talk that Jesus gave.

Joe Green
Joe Green
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:51am

Notre Dame, along with Georgetown and a few other “Catholic” schools, have long since strayed by taking a more secular path, promoting “diversity” and supporting social issues that are anathema to the Church. Jenky would do well to quit ND altogether. I hope the rest of the bishops rally around him.

In the words of Chesterton:

“From all that terror teaches, from lies of tongue and pen,
From all the easy speeches that comfort cruel men,
From sale and profanation of honor and the sword
From sleep and from damnation, deliver us, good Lord.”

Bonchamps
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 8:11am

Of course Obama is nothing like Hitler or Stalin.

He’s more like Otto von Bismarck.

Paul W Primavera
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 8:22am

I wasn’t aware of Bismarck’s Kulturkampf against the Catholic Church. Why is none of this taught in the history classes of public schools?

From wikipedia:

Bismarck launched an anti-Catholic Kulturkampf (“culture struggle”) in Prussia in 1871. In its course all the Prussian bishops and many priests were imprisoned or exiled.[26] Prussia’s population greatly expanded in the 1860s and now was one-third Catholic. Bismarck believed that the Catholic Church held too much political power; he was further concerned about the emergence of the Catholic Centre Party (organised in 1870). With support from the anticlerical National Liberal Party, which had become Bismarck’s chief ally in the Reichstag, he abolished the Catholic Department of the Prussian Ministry of Culture. That left the Catholics without a voice in high circles. In 1872, the Jesuits were expelled from Germany. More severe anti-Roman Catholic laws of 1873 allowed the Prussian government to supervise the education of the Roman Catholic clergy, and curtailed the disciplinary powers of the Church. In 1875, civil ceremonies were required for weddings, which could hitherto be performed in churches. The Catholics reacted by organizing themselves; they strengthened the Centre Party. Bismarck, a devout pietistic Protestant, was alarmed that secularists and socialists were using the Kulturkampf to attack all religion. He abandoned the Kulturkampf in 1878 to preserve his remaining political capital; indeed, he needed the Centre Party votes in his new battle against socialism. Pius IX died that same year, replaced by a more pragmatic Pope Leo XIII who negotiated away most of the anti-Catholic laws.[27][page needed][28][page needed]

james aldendifer
james aldendifer
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 8:23am

I remember Bishop Jenky, before he became bishop, while still rector of Sacred Heart ( I think he was anyway). He was full of joy and radiated Christ like no other. My kids loved him ( which was no easy feat as they were naturally resistant to clergy as teenagers). I also observed his homilies were Christ oriented, not the usual pc stuff given by some of the other csc priest. Praise God for him and others who are willing to shine the light of truth!

Bonchamps
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 8:42am

We have seen it over and over again: Gallicanism, conciliarism, Josephism, laicism, Kulturkampf, Cristeros War, communism, sexual revolution.

I’d like to say the Church bounces back stronger every time. In reality, each one of these episodes takes a piece out of her. That is why Christ must come again.

T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 11:16am

The only question I have is, “What took them so long?”

Apparently, the progressive propaganda glossary has evolved – There’s that word, again!

In 2012, the drones term preaching the Gospel: “incendiary.” Formerly, Clinton’s press secretary, Joe Lockhart, used the phrase “ancient religious hatred.”

One lesson learned. I knew the clueless college profs teach their minions what to think, not how to think. Now, I see that credentialed cretins themselves don’t know how to think, either.

Michael Paterson-Seymour
Michael Paterson-Seymour
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 12:51pm

Ignatius of Antioch, whose life covered the second half of the first century, wrote “”Follow the Bishop, all of you, as Jesus Christ follows his Father, and the presbyterium as the Apostles. As for the deacons, respect them as the Law of God. Let no one do anything with reference to the Church without the Bishop. Only that Eucharist may be regarded as legitimate which is celebrated with the bishop or his delegate presiding. Where the Bishop is, there let the community be, just as where Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.” Epis Smyrn 8,1-2″ and the same teaching can be gathered from all the old holy fathers and catholic doctors, from the apostles’ time down to our own day.

trackback
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 6:00pm

[…] Univ. of Notre Dame Faculty Attacks Bishop Jenky – Donald R. McClarey, The Amrcn Cthlc […]

vincent
vincent
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:14pm

Those who get worked up about comparing Obama to Hitler and call his talk hate speech ought to think before they write. The analogy does not compare Mr Obama’s policies to the genocide of Hitler it compare their policies towards religion. That is a valid comparison. If the good bishop would have compared validly Obama’s religious policy to that of the leaders of the French Revolution that would have worked also but it is somehow off limits to compare policies to those of Hitler.

Barbara Gordon
Barbara Gordon
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:26pm

I think what made them angrier than anything else was the fact that Bishop Jenky unashamedly proclaimed the Gospel of Jesus Christ by stating that Jesus Christ rose from the dead and is therefore the Son of God He claimed to be. Just try saying that to a few liberals if you want to see their heads start spinning and green vomit start to come out of their mouths.

Hank
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 7:48pm

Don

A modest proposal.

The Congegation of the Holy Cross could suggest to Rome that that their borther Daniel Jenky Be amde a titular Archbishop and appointed President the University of Notre Dame. It may take him a few years but no one would doubt the School is Our Ladies.

Noah Teale
Noah Teale
Wednesday, April 25, AD 2012 9:05pm

Readers of this thread may find interest in the short book: How Do You Kill 11 Million People? by Andy Andrews. It’s a recent NYT best seller available on Amazon, et al. In the book Andrew succinctly explains tactics employed by the Nazis to lull an ostensibly God-fearing and altruistic German populace into a mass state of apathy and denial as freedoms were stripped-away, the Holocaust was engineered and a world war ensued. His premise is that without vigilant and informed citizens demanding integrity and accountability from their leaders, a similar loss of freedom may one day happen here or anywhere. Perhaps that day is already here, and instances such as this-with the reactions imbued-are proof.

Joel Hutchens
Joel Hutchens
Thursday, April 26, AD 2012 7:21am

Fire the Forty-Nine!

Don Maswell
Don Maswell
Thursday, April 26, AD 2012 1:56pm

What did Bishop Jenky say?

“Hitler and Stalin, at their better moments, would just barely tolerate some churches remaining open, but would not tolerate any competition with the state in education, social services, and health care.
In clear violation of our First Amendment rights, Barack Obama—with his radical, pro abortion and extreme secularist agenda, now seems intent on following a similar path”.

Hitler and Stalin do NOT belong in the same speech or in any comparison with President Obama! If he or anyone else do not understand why, they should return to school and study the political and military history of the 20th century. Sorry if you do not understand that.

Paul W Primavera
Thursday, April 26, AD 2012 2:37pm

Don Maswell,

You don’t get it. Obama is just like Hitler – supporting baby murdering to the tune of 1 million per year.

Hilter, Stalin, Robespierre, Obama – they are all antichrists.

Mary De Voe
Thursday, April 26, AD 2012 4:52pm

Vincednt: Obama is not done with us yet. Hitler and Stalin started by taking power over the church and ended by killing millions of people.
Don: Good thinking.

Mary De Voe
Thursday, April 26, AD 2012 4:53pm

Vincent: I am sorry I fumbled your name

Malia Eken
Thursday, April 26, AD 2012 7:02pm

I used to be proud of the many ND graduates from our family, but I am so disillusioned by recent ND anti-Catholic positions, that we will no longer fund ND. Also, are actively encouraging other alumni and family members to do the same.

Pray for those in leadership positions at ND. Ask our Lady’s intersession with Jesus Christ, her son, to redeem their minds, their hearts and their souls.

God forgive them for they know not what they do!

Aloha ke Akua
Malia

Don Maswell
Don Maswell
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 5:40am

“Under the vision of the Obama administration the Catholic Church, and all churches which oppose him, are to be restricted to conducting services and submitting themselves to government control in all other matters”.

Trash talk like the big Nazi lie! PROVE IT.

If you really believe this, I pity you and will pray that you come to your senses.

Mike Petrik
Mike Petrik
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 6:05am

Don Maswell, you are wrong, The Obama Administration’s understanding of the First Amendment’s free exercise clause is that it affords no protection against the application of general laws outside of the performance of religious rituals. This means, of course, that all churches are subject to government control in all other matters. Sadly, this is not an idiosyncratic view of the free exercise clause, whose reach has long confused liberal jurists mindful of the establishment clause. The words of the free exercise clause plainly suggest a fairly broad application, but the Left’s expansive misunderstanding of the establishment clause has caused it to have a neutered understanding of the free exercise clause. This is not trash talk. This is a fact.

C D Rossini Jr
C D Rossini Jr
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 10:43am

The word catholic (little c) means universal, as in diverse, or encompassing many points of view. Having one Church means we are united in the core, and welcome all in the non-essentials, which are many. Catholics are Republican and Democrat, members of Pax Christi and of the armed forces, high tax people, free marketers, etc.

It is puzzling that the very same academics that claim diversity and a variety of philosophies reject a traditional Catholic point of view. Or are they modernists that believe that their role is “creative destruction of the status quo” to implement a totalitarian vision based on the bold quest for power alone? Who is the uber-mench (Nietzche’s over-man)? Is the only crime left to oppose him?

Tom Murphy
Tom Murphy
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 11:17am

Where’s Jenkins?

Marie
Marie
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 11:32am

Don’t abandon Notre Dame. Fight for her.

Phillip
Phillip
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 12:00pm

“Or are they modernists that believe that their role is “creative destruction of the status quo” to implement a totalitarian vision based on the bold quest for power alone? Who is the uber-mench (Nietzche’s over-man)? Is the only crime left to oppose him?”

Here is their god and the efforts this god will make to retain power:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304723304577368280604524916.html

WK Aiken
WK Aiken
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 12:15pm

More idiocy:

http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/bishop-jenkys-assessment-of-religious-liberty-battle-raises-question-about

The whole progression if Obamacare, from one-party rule, in-paarty bullying and bribery and obvious vioation of long-sacred rights, is a repeat of the Reichstag 1930-31. the only thing missing is Ludendorff (although Jimmy Carter would make a good stand-in if we could find a funny hat.)

trackback
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 12:52pm

[…] Father Wilson Miscamble, a priest of the Congregation of the Holy Cross and a history professor at Notre Dame defends Bishop Jenky from the attacks of members of the Notre Dame faculty: […]

Malia
Malia
Friday, April 27, AD 2012 1:58pm

Marie, we WILL fight for ND with our prayers, but we will NOT contribute our $$$ to an anti-Catholic faculty. If ND allows their faculty to oppose the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Church, then we feel obligated to withdraw our support of ND’s anti-Catholic faculty by ending our alumni funding. Sorry, but our conscience demands that we fight this anti-Catholic movement with everything we have, i.e. prayers AND $$$.

Malia

Don C
Sunday, April 29, AD 2012 11:48am

The Pastor at my church St Michael the Archangel (Society of St Pius X) Farmingville NY read Bishop Jenky words today. Hopefully the Catholics are starting to wake up with whats happening in our country and do something. Vote Vote Vote!

Mark Cossack
Mark Cossack
Tuesday, May 1, AD 2012 6:17pm

Take a look at the actual titles of those ND professors who chose to sign the letter. There are only three that have anything to do with Theology or Philosophy. The rest are simply malcontents who prefer to push their secular agenda. There are absolutely phenomenal, pious, and devout students and faculty at ND but they often are not heard from.

By contrast, look at the heavy hitters from ND that signed this strong condemnation of Obama’s assault on religious liberty: (names follow the article)
UNACCEPTABLE
FEBRUARY 21, 2012

The Obama administration has offered what it has styled as an “accommodation” for religious institutions in the dispute over the HHS mandate for coverage (without cost sharing) of abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. The administration will now require that all insurance plans cover (“cost free”) these same products and services. Once a religiously-affiliated (or believing individual) employer purchases insurance (as it must, by law), the insurance company will then contact the insured employees to advise them that the terms of the policy include coverage for these objectionable things.
This so-called “accommodation” changes nothing of moral substance and fails to remove the assault on religious liberty and the rights of conscience which gave rise to the controversy. It is certainly no compromise. The reason for the original bipartisan uproar was the administration’s insistence that religious employers, be they institutions or individuals, provide insurance that covered services they regard as gravely immoral and unjust. Under the new rule, the government still coerces religious institutions and individuals to purchase insurance policies that include the very same services.
It is no answer to respond that the religious employers are not “paying” for this aspect of the insurance coverage. For one thing, it is unrealistic to suggest that insurance companies will not pass the costs of these additional services on to the purchasers. More importantly, abortion-drugs, sterilizations, and contraceptives are a necessary feature of the policy purchased by the religious institution or believing individual. They will only be made available to those who are insured under such policy, by virtue of the terms of the policy.
It is morally obtuse for the administration to suggest (as it does) that this is a meaningful accommodation of religious liberty because the insurance company will be the one to inform the employee that she is entitled to the embryo-destroying “five day after pill” pursuant to the insurance contract purchased by the religious employer. It does not matter who explains the terms of the policy purchased by the religiously affiliated or observant employer. What matters is what services the policy covers.
The simple fact is that the Obama administration is compelling religious people and institutions who are employers to purchase a health insurance contract that provides abortion-inducing drugs, contraception, and sterilization. This is a grave violation of religious freedom and cannot stand. It is an insult to the intelligence of Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox Christians, Jews, Muslims, and other people of faith and conscience to imagine that they will accept an assault on their religious liberty if only it is covered up by a cheap accounting trick.
Finally, it bears noting that by sustaining the original narrow exemptions for churches, auxiliaries, and religious orders, the administration has effectively admitted that the new policy (like the old one) amounts to a grave infringement on religious liberty. The administration still fails to understand that institutions that employ and serve others of different or no faith are still engaged in a religious mission and, as such, enjoy the protections of the First Amendment.

O. Carter Snead
Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame
Margaret F. Brinig
Fritz Duda Family Chair in Law Notre Dame Law School
Daniel Costello
Bettex Chair Professor Emeritus
College of Engineering, University of Notre Dame
Ann W. Astell
Professor of Theology, University of Notre Dame
Don P. Kommers
Robbie Professor of Political Science Emeritus University of Notre Dame
Robert M. Gimello
Research Professor of Theology and of East Asian Languages and Cultures University of Notre Dame
Tom Pratt
Dept of EE, College of Engineering University of Notre Dame
David W. Fagerberg
Associate Professor
Department of Theology University of Notre Dame
Peter M. Kogge
Ted McCourtney Prof. of Computer Science & Engineering Concurrent Professor of Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Notre Dame
Michael J. Crowe
Cavanaugh Professor Emeritus Program of Liberal Studies University of Notre Dame
Msgr Michael Heintz, PhD

Director, Master of Divinity Program Department of Theology
University of Notre Dame
John Uhran
Emeritus Professor, Computer Science and Engineering University of Notre Dame
Thomas A. Gresik
Department of Economics
University of Notre Dame
W. David Solomon
Associate Professor of Philosophy University of Notre Dame
Dr. Kirk Doran
Assistant Professor of Economics University of Notre Dame
Tonia Hap Murphy
Mendoza Pre-Law Advisor Associate Teaching Professor University of Notre Dame
Jim A Seida
Viola D. Hank Associate Professor of Accountancy Mendoza College of Business
University of Notre Dame
Jeffrey J. Burks
Assistant Professor of Accountancy University of Notre Dame
Adrian J. Reimers
Adjunct Assistant Professor University of Notre Dame
Patrick Griffin
Department Chair and Madden-Hennebry Professor of History, University of Notre Dame
Richard W. Garnett
Associate Dean and Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame
John Cavadini
Director, Institute for Church Life and Associate Professor of Theology, University of Notre Dame
Christian Smith

William R. Kenan Professor of Sociology & Director, Center for the Study of Religion and Society, University of Notre Dame
Gary Anderson
Hesburgh Professor of Theology, University of Notre Dame
Harindra Joseph F. Fernando
Wayne and Diana Murdy Endowed Professor of Engineering and Geosciences, University of Notre Dame
William N. Evans
Keough-Hesburgh Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame
Alfred J. Freddoso
John and Jean Oesterle Professor of Thomistic Studies Concurrent Professor of Law
Philosophy Department, University of Notre Dame
M. Katherine Tillman
Professor Emerita, Program of Liberal Studies, University of Notre Dame
Walter Nicgorski
Professor, Program of Liberal Studies, University of Notre Dame
Philip Bess
Director of Graduate Studies and Professor of Architecture, University of Notre Dame
Paolo Carozza
Professor of Law and Director, Center for Civil and Human Rights, University of Notre Dame
John F. Gaski
Associate Professor of Marketing, University of Notre Dame
Duncan G. Stroik
Associate Professor of Architecture, University of Notre Dame
Rev. Wilson D. Miscamble, C.S.C.
Professor of History, University of Notre Dame
Kenneth Garcia, Ph.D.
Associate Director, Institute for Scholarship in the Liberal Arts, University of Notre Dame
Gerard V. Bradley
Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame
Amy Barrett
Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame
Sean Kelsey
Director of Graduate Studies and Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame

Gabriel Said Reynolds
Tisch Family Associate Professor of Islamic Studies and Theology University of Notre Dame
William K. Kelley
Associate Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame
David O’Connor
Associate Professor of Philosophy and Concurrent Associate Professor of Classics, University of Notre Dame
Joseph Kaboski
David F. and Erin M. Seng Associate Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame
Vincent Phillip Muñoz
Tocqueville Associate Professor of Political Science Concurrent Associate Professor of Law
Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame
John O’Callaghan
Director, Jacques Maritain Center & Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame
Daniel Philpott
Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Notre Dame
Mary M . Keys
Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Notre Dame
Eric Sims
Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame
Mike Pries
Associate Professor of Economics, University of Notre Dame
Edward Maginn
Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Associate Dean for Academic Programs, The Graduate School University of Notre Dame
Angela M. Pfister, J.D.
Associate Director, Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture Concurrent Instructor, Mendoza College of Business University of Notre Dame
Stephen F. Smith Professor of Law University of Notre Dame

Phillip R. Sloan
Professor Emeritus, Program of Liberal Studies and Graduate Program in History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame
Richard A. Lamanna
Emeritus Professor of Sociology University of Notre Dame
Fr. Ronald M. Vierling Rector, Morrissey Manor University of Notre Dame
Rev. William R. Dailey, CSC Visiting Associate Professor Notre Dame Law School
Thomas A. Stapleford
Associate Professor, Program of Liberal Studies University of Notre Dame
Thomas P. Flint
Professor of Philosophy University of Notre Dame
Daniel J. Costello, Jr.
Bettex Prof. of Elec. Engr., Emeritus University of Notre Dame
Nicole Stelle Garnett
Professor of Law
University of Notre Dame
James O’Brien
Associate Teaching Professor University of Notre Dame
Matthew J. Barrett
Professor of Law
Notre Dame Law School
Marian E. Crowe
Adjunct Assistant Professor
Visiting Scholar, Program of Liberal Studies University of Notre Dame
Trent Dougherty
Department of Philosophy Baylor University
Visiting Research Professor

University of Notre Dame
Charles E. Rice
Professor Emeritus
Notre Dame Law School
Thomas Gordon Smith
Professor of Architecture, University of Notre Dame

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top