Friday, April 19, AD 2024 3:38am

I Am Shocked, Shocked!

Democrats producing fraudulent votes in inner city Philadelphia:

Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally) removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Mr. Obama received “astronomical” numbers in those very same regions, including locations where he received “over 99%” of the vote.

Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55.

Is it odd that a county that expelled GOP inspectors and had people openly campaigning for Obama ended with 99.5% for Obama and 9955 votes for him? It’s up to you to decide.

This from the combox of this article:

I worked the polls as a republican watcher in the 2008 election in Philadelphia, 5th ward (6th and Fairmount streets). I was shown how to do the job by a pregnant lady who met me before 7:00 AM in front of the voting place. We went in at 6:55 AM, and voting started with us at 7:00 AM. She showed me the ropes voted and left. I was to look up the voters in the registration book and then they would sign in and there names were written into another book. As I was new I learned as we went. The lady who had the book where the names of voters were being hand written in it kept asking me who the names of different voters to verify that they were right. Later in the day we switched out and I had the book with the hand written voters in it. It listed there names, and their party. As the day went on I got bored and looked to see how many republicans had voted. Only one the lady who brought me in at about 6:55 AM. Voting started at 7:00 AM. She was voter number 21. 20 votes were case before we got there! They were back filling in the names after I got the registration book. That’s why she needed to keep asking me who various voters were. She needed names to go with the votes. 248 votes were cast for that 2008 election. 244 for democrats and four republicans. 20 were stolen (12.2 percent). If I wasn’t there it would have gone on all day. In fact when I went home for lunch I’m sure it happened also. When I called the lady who trained me she said call the hotline! Their stealing votes! I did and help showed up later in the day. But the votes were already stolen.

This crime against democracy has been perpetrated by the Party of the Jackass for generations.  So long as the Republican Party lacks the intestinal fortitude to do anything about it, this will go on.

 

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rozin
Rozin
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 7:19pm

So,

Who’s the governor and who controls the legislature? The sad thing is they didn’t need to cheat. I don’t think the Dems had 300k phony ballots although you never know. Do Nothing Casey won by a huge margin. He had the magic letter D by his name. The GOP Senate hopefuls across the country ran far behind Romney. They were about as popular as ants at a picnic.

Siobhan
Siobhan
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 7:20pm

My gut tells me that this election was rigged. If that makes me sound like a nut, that’s ok, I’ll take the hit. I refuse to believe that Romney got less votes than John McCain who was a weak candidate who ran a weak campaign. His votes either went down a rabbit’s hole or they flipped enough votes for Obama to “win.”

Rozin
Rozin
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 7:27pm

Siobhan,

I think many Repubs stayed home. The Dems made many phone calls and mailings calls I believe concerning religious affiliaition and anyway many Repubs were not going to vote for another RINO as they saw it. This was known as a potential issue from last year. It happened. Not discounting massive cheating but a 2.5 million ballot difference is quite a lot.

anzlyne
anzlyne
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 7:37pm

“2.5 million ballot difference is quite a lot.”

they think big don’t they! I agree with Siobahn. I don’t know how exactly, but that is my gut feeling too.

Also I have always wondered why the Repub officials in Iowa couldn’t bring themselves to come to a Santorum victory count– what was up with that? I think the R muckety mucks always wanted Romney

Rozin
Rozin
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 7:55pm

Folks,

Sorry but this is just evasion to not grapple with what happened. There is 10% unemployment (really) with another 10% underemployed. There is declining income, a shrinking workforce, an unpopular healthcare bill, EPA attacks on coal and oil, an impending debt crisis and a northeastern Repub moderate can’t obliterate the incumbent in PA, NH, OH, MI, WI and MN?? It should have been a wipeout but not a single poll ever indicated that, even Rasmussen and Gallup. Also how do you explain the even more miserable performance of the Senate candidates? If the national vote difference was a couple hundred thousand I would agree it was stolen. Here in VA I saw how efficient the Dems were in getting out their vote. They were a sullen and morose bunch but they went and pushed the D. The Repubs voter efforts were a joke by comparison.

anzlyne
anzlyne
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 8:16pm

I agree with you Rozin, with Mr McClarey, with the idea that a significant part of the electorate is seriously deficient in critical thinking skills, and with 50 years of liberal media suasion– and with Siobahn. I’m voting “all of the above”.

PM
PM
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 8:34pm

1. The ‘new MS’ electronic machines that needed rebooting to begin etc.
2. Where were those machines discovered that wouldn’t read R votes, only D?
3. The vehement opposition to Voters showing ID’s. (Galls me)
4. Murals of O in some polling place, I saw a report.
5. How could the great numbers of people at Mitt Romney rallies compared to the numbers at O rallies have not voted?
6. The popular vote is not so far off, considering the relationship of the admin to numbers, greed, and honesty.
7. The admin’s overexercise of influence on media probably happened with areas of voting and incompetent workers.
8. Nothing honorable or trustworthy about admin as precedent to believe this operation of 11/6 was properly done.
9. Why aren’t the results more widely published for we the people?

Siobhan
Siobhan
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 8:59pm

Rozin, I hear what you’re saying, but I can’t get pass the fact that Romney and Ryan appeared so confident of victory to the point that Romney didn’t even prepare a concession speech. Maybe they were just good actors and maybe Romney was done in by hubris, but what about Michael Barone – the best analyst in the business. How could he be so off? The polls all showed a tight race, but they also showed that the enthusiasm was clearly with the people who wanted Obama gone. I know it can never be proven, but it just doesn’t add up.

Here’s something interesting from The Ulsterman Report. Yes, I’m aware that we have to be careful with sites like this, but he does make some interesting points.

http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/11/07/data-points-to-a-powerful-romney-campaign-and-yet-he-lost/

Rozin
Rozin
Thursday, November 8, AD 2012 10:14pm

Siobhan

Go look at the Drudge Report and the “Romney shellshocked” link. They got the polls saying that Dem turnout would be high but they didn’t believe them. I said that the Dems I saw voting looked totally depressed but they had been pushed to the polls. The Dems didn’t bother pushing them to the rallies. Very smart.

Penguins Fan
Penguins Fan
Saturday, November 10, AD 2012 7:39am

Pennsylvania and Ohio have GOP governors. PA Governor Corbett – when he was attorney sought and convicted a LOT of Democrat state legislators. He could have done something about Philly voter fraud. Kasich, the Ohio governor, and a native of the Pittsburgh area (McKees Rocks) could have done something about the Cleveland fraud.

What did they do? Nothing much.

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top