Je Suis Charles Martel

“A victorious line of march had been prolonged above a thousand miles from the rock of Gibraltar in Spain to the banks of the Loire in France; the repetition of an equal space would have carried the Saracens to the confines of Poland and the Highlands of Scotland; the Rhine is not more impassable than the Nile or Euphrates, and the Arabian Fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the River Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Qur’an would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Muhammed.”

Edward Gibbon, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

The slogan Je Suis Charles Martel is beginning to make its way around Saint Blogs.  Here is some information on the grandfather of Charlemagne who stopped the advance of Islam into what became France in 732 at the battle of Tours.


Charles Martel, “The Hammer”, led a life of conflict.  An illegitimate son of Pepin of Herstal, Mayor of the Palace and the true power behind the Merovingian puppet kings, after the death of his father he had to fight his father’s legitimate offspring who sought to deprive him of any share in his father’s inheritance.  Fortunately for Charles a streak of military genius ran through him, and he won battles against the odds, using force multiplying stratagems, including feigned retreats, and attacking in the middle of the day when armies of his time normally took a siesta.  By 717 he was in control of Neustria, showing mercy unusual for his day in letting his defeated adversaries live and treating them with kindness.

The 28 year old ruler now entered a round of endless wars with neighboring kingdoms, gradually extending his power, and building up a professional force of infantry to supplement the peasant levies that made up the vast bulk of most Frankish armies.

A friend and patron of Saint Boniface, he also began the alliance between the rulers of the Franks and the Popes.  He contributed much land to the Church, but roused ecclesiastical ire when he took some back to support his troops.  He might have been excommunicated if both Church and State had not suddenly confronted a common foe.

In 711 the forces of Islam began the conquest of Spain, helped along by Christian traitors.  Within a decade almost all of Spain had fallen, with small proto-kingdoms of Spaniards clinging to a precarious independence in the mountains of northern Spain.  Mohammed had died less than a century before in 632, and in that intervening period Islam had conquered the Middle East, northern Africa and seemed poised to do the same in Europe against the petty Christian kingdoms that specialized in ceaseless internecine war, seemingly weakening themselves before  their Islamic foes lifted a finger.

With Spain subdued, Muslim raids into what is now France became common.  In 732 Abd-al-Raḥmân, governor of Muslim Spain, led a predominantly cavalry army of 25,000 men north on a great raid beyond the Pyrenees, perhaps the prelude to a war of  conquest.

Charles Martel rallied together an infantry army of 15,000, and in early October 732 his army and that of Abd-al-Raḥmân confronted each other for seven days outside of Tours, Martel making certain to occupy the high ground.   Martel had his army drawn up in a huge phalanx.  Tiring of the stalemate, on October 10, 732 Abd-al-Raḥmân launched cavalry charge after cavalry charge against the Franks.  A Muslim chronicler tells us what happened next:

And in the shock of the battle the men of the North seemed like a sea that cannot be moved. Firmly they stood, one close to another, forming as it were a bulwark of ice; and with great blows of their swords they hewed down the Arabs. Drawn up in a band around their chief, the people of the Austrasians carried all before them. Their tireless hands drove their swords down to the breasts [of the foe].

Martel launched an attack on the enemy camp, causing Abd-al-Raḥmân to order a retreat to his camp.  The retreat became a rout after Abd-al-Raḥmân  was killed in the fighting.

A Christian chronicle sums up the outcome of Tours:

Prince Charles boldly drew up his battle lines against them [the Arabs] and the warrior rushed in against them. With Christ’s help he overturned their tents, and hastened to battle to grind them small in slaughter. The king Abdirama having been killed, he destroyed [them], driving forth the army, he fought and won. Thus did the victor triumph over his enemies.

After Tours, Charles spent the rest of his life fighting off Islamic invasions from Spain.  Much hard fighting remained ahead, but Tours was the turning point.  The Franks would remain Christians and they ensured that Europe would remain Christian, thanks to God and the hard fighting Charles Martel and his Frankish infantry.

More to explorer


  1. Is there a reason that the destruction and slaughter is unmentionable (as in religious leaders calling/begging universally for prayer for help and more for the victims) and unmentioned (as in media outcry) on the info superhighway where all is ‘known’ but the reporting sifted? There must be some inhumane, corrupt thing in the allowing of continued behaviors. Ignorance isn’t really bliss in the end. Charles Martel was a friend of Saint Boniface! May history repeat itself.

  2. “Thanks to God”, yes! No thanks to our current pope who famously stated that “violence never conquers violence”. Then again, Islam isn’t on his doorstep.

  3. Patricia, history will not repeat itself; at least not as you think.
    The end is already nigh. The armies of the Lord Jesus are on the horizon. Look.

  4. “Je suis Charlie” is gas: the clucking of chickens.

    What are you prepared to do?

    When Christ comes in glory he will forsake those that brawl against His religion.

  5. …redo?

    We’re in the middle of one right now. You probably noticed, even though it’s not polite to talk about it.

  6. Father of seven: ““Thanks to God”, yes! No thanks to our current pope who famously stated that “violence never conquers violence”. Then again, Islam isn’t on his doorstep.”

    Pope Francis does not know the difference between violence and force. “Who am I to judge?”
    Jesus went to hell to free the patriarchs. Who is for Jesus?

  7. Pinky, the Turks, not the Arabs, took Constantinople in 1453, 39 years before Queen Isabel the Catholic completed the Reconquest and subsequently spread the Catholic Faith to the New World.

    One evening, not long ago, I was wasting time watching a TV program called Who Do You Think You Are? It always features a celebrity, in who I have no interest. This episode was about the former model Cindy Crawford. Her ancestry was traced to Charlemagne, the grandson of Charles Martel. In the same series, Brooke Shields found out that she was a first cousin many times removed of King St. Louis IX. I admit that finding out one is related to a famous historical Catholic is fascinating.

  8. We have yet to see the impact of eccumenism, tolerance,and the “who am I to judge” mentality that has been totally misunderstood. Christians are contributing to their own persecution and destruction, Kyrie Eleison!

  9. Msgr Anthony Spinosa: “We have yet to see the impact of eccumenism, tolerance,and the “who am I to judge” mentality that has been totally misunderstood. Christians are contributing to their own persecution and destruction, Kyrie Eleison!”.
    It is Pope Francis’ job to give us, the laity, “understanding”, wisdom and understanding. Failing this, what has anyone to do with ecumentsm if it only brings chaos and conflict and division?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: