Doug Schoen Backs Away From Clinton

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on delicious
Share on digg
Share on stumbleupon
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Share on print

Long time Democrat political operative Doug Schoen pulled his support from Clinton last night on Fox:


DOUG SCHOEN: As you know, I have been a supporter of Secretary Clinton… But given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election… But if the Secretary of State wins, we will have a president under criminal investigation, with Huma Abedin under criminal investigation, with the Secretary of State, the president-elect, should she win under investigation.

Harris, under these circumstances, I am actively reassessing my support. I’m not a Trump —

HARRIS FAULKNER, FOX NEWS: Whoa, whoa, wait a minute. You are not going to vote for Hillary Clinton?

SCHOEN: Harris, I’m deeply concerned that we’ll have a constitutional crisis if she’s elected.


SCHOEN: I want to learn more this week. See what we see. But as of today, I am not a supporter of the Secretary of State for the nation’s highest office.

FAULKNER: How long have you known the clintons.

SCHOEN: I’ve known the clintons since ’94.

FAULKNER: Wow! But their friend here has said he’s reconsidering.

SCHOEN: I have to, because of the impact on the governance of the country and our international situation.

FAULKNER: So the news in that is are there other people, I would imagine, like Doug Schoen.

Schoen went on to elaborate that electing as President someone under a criminal investigation would lead an undering confrontation in Washington.  That the situation would be made worse if Obama pardoned Clinton, or if Clinton pardoned herself.  Ironically the only man who could pardon Clinton and move beyond all this would be a President Trump.

More to explorer

Saint of the Day Quote: Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War

Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. Matthew 10: 39  

Year Zero Again

  Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no

September 22, 1776: Nathan Hale’s Only Regret

How beautiful is death, when earn’d by virtue! Who would not be that youth? What pity is it That we can die


  1. FYI That was a rhetorical question. Votes for Hillary tell me more about despicable people voting than about criminal Hillary.
    Just heard on FOX Business (Charlie Gasperino) : FBI rank-and-file investigators would have recommended indictments. Crooked Comey and lying Lynch feloniously quashed it.
    Additionally, we can’t abide autocrats in the Supreme Court and White House who would ban/outlaw the Church and its 2,000 year-old Teachings on faith and morals.

  2. I was not surprised. Doug seems like a fair and d balanced kind of guy. But I was surprised at Harris Faulkner’s reaction. HARRIS FAULKNER, FOX NEWS: Whoa, whoa, wait a minute. You are not going to vote for Hillary Clinton? Like you, an upright guy, are not going to vote for a crook, a cheat, a bribe taker and maybe guilty of treason?

    My guess is there are a number of folks at Fox News in the tank for Clinton especially the new management and that Megyn person. There is talk that the new head of Fox is the guy who has been running CNN.

Comments are closed.