Thursday, March 28, AD 2024 8:39pm

Quotes Suitable for Framing: Robert E. Lee

I can only say that while I have considered the preservation of the constitutional power of the General Government to be the foundation of our peace and safety at home and abroad, I yet believe that the maintenance of the rights and authority reserved to the states and to the people, not only essential to the adjustment and balance of the general system, but the safeguard to the continuance of a free government. I consider it as the chief source of stability to our political system, whereas the consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded it. I need not refer one so well acquainted as you are with American history, to the State papers of Washington and Jefferson, the representatives of the federal and democratic parties, denouncing consolidation and centralization of power, as tending to the subversion of State Governments, and to despotism.

Robert E. Lee, In a letter to Lord Acton, December 15, 1866

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
T. Shaw
T. Shaw
Wednesday, August 30, AD 2017 7:33am

“He was a foe without hate; a friend without treachery; a soldier without cruelty; a victor without oppression; and a victim without murmuring. He was a public officer without vices; a private citizen without wrong; a neighbor without reproach; a Christian without hypocrisy and a man without guile. He was a Caesar without his ambition; Frederick without his tyranny; Napoleon without his selfishness; and Washington without his reward.”
Benjamin H. Hill on Robert E. Lee

Identity politics buried the putrid corpse of the Democrat Party.

Uncommon valor in fighting statues.

Tom McKenna
Wednesday, August 30, AD 2017 7:50am

A perfect summation of the proximate cause for the Late Unpleasantness and of its arguable effects on our original system of federalism. It’s tragic that the immediate cause for the conflict was the morally indefensible but constitutionally permitted practice of slavery.

Mary De Voe
Wednesday, August 30, AD 2017 8:10am

How could Gen. Robert E. Lee say such beautiful things and then lead an army to oppose the freedom of all men created equal in original innocence? Lee could not possibly have believed in our Founding Principles.

John Hynds
John Hynds
Thursday, August 31, AD 2017 11:58am

Mary De Voe, I wonder if Lee, being historically sound & looking at the bigger long term picture, was fighting against the eventual enslavement of all people in the nation. The usurpation of states rights and deferral to federal powers was accomplished in this war. As a result, we are all beholden to federal powers today that are nowhere in the Constitution. With individual States, there were places to go, today, there is nowhere to go.

Mary De Voe
Thursday, August 31, AD 2017 3:55pm

Go to our Founding Principles: THE UNANIMOUS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE and THE CONSTITUTION, both ratified by every state. Twelve years after our Unanimous Declaration of Independence, our Constitution was signed and ratified.
In the our Constitution you will find Art. I sections 9 and 10, especially section 10: “No state shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation…”like the Confederate States.
WHO are “We, the people”? “We, the people” are all past generations, the present generation and all future generations, our Constitutional Posterity” sovereign persons who institute government and comprise a nation.
Until the Person of Jesus Christ was exiled from the public square, virtue reigned in our culture. Now, atheism is imposed, our constitutional Posterity are murdered in the womb, the addiction to the vice of lust and sodomy are called marriage, pornography is considered entertainment, evil is applauded as success, license is considered freedom, patriotism is replace by political correctness, humility is replaced with rapaciousness and savagery. Civilization?

Tom McKenna
Friday, September 1, AD 2017 9:33am

Declaration and Constitution ratified by independent nations, the thirteen colonies; and they never gave up their sovereign ability and that of their people to withdraw from the union. In fact, they were fighting a war against England precisely to establish such a fundamental right to throw off a government when it seemed appropriate to the people. No signatory country understood the Constitution as a surrender of aboriginal sovereignty.

Tom McKenna
Sunday, September 3, AD 2017 10:15am

That’s logically impossible, Don. If the states were not fully independent to begin with after the Revolution, there would have been no need to hammer out a constitution expressly spelling out how much sovereignty the states were ceding to the federal government. I’d refer you to the Federalist/Anti-Federalist debates for ample evidence that states had to be *convinced* to *join* the union. They could, and several did, delay or defer joining. Under your theory, there would have been no need for ratification by each state of the Constitution. Clearly they were acting as separate, independent entities. The Declaration, which is aspirational and not a legally binding document, itself manifestly refers to “States,” as a plurality, not “nation:”

these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

Whatever one thinks of secession, it’s beyond reasonable denial that 13 independent, sovereign entities entered into a contract ceding very specific powers, and those only, to a federal government for certain very limited joint purposes, reserving all non-specifically delegated sovereignty (cf, 10th Amendment among others).

Discover more from The American Catholic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top