That’s Entertainment!



News that I missed, courtesy of The Babylon Bee:


WASHINGTON, D.C.—After a long day in the office Monday, congressional representative Rashida Tlaib reportedly popped a bag of popcorn, settled back into her chair, and watched her favorite heartwarming concentration camp scenes from Steven Spielberg’s classic film Schindler’s List.

“This scene where this Jewish girl gets shot in cold blood—it just provides me with a really great calming feeling,” she said, according to frightened aides, as she leaned back and took in her favorite scene in the movie. “A real, enormous sense of peace and tranquility.”

“I mean, of course, because my ancestors provided a place the Jews could settle,” she quickly added. “I definitely don’t mean the Holocaust itself is calming. But still, when I think about it, I just feel these waves of serenity breaking over me like a summer storm.”

Go here to read the rest.  Benny Morris, an Israeli historian, the foremost expert on the founding of Israel, who has often criticized Israel in the past, corrects Tlaib’s fantasy about her ancestors providing a haven for the Jews from Hitler:


After Hitler’s accession to power in Germany in 1933, German and then Eastern European Jews sought escape and safe havens. But all the Western countries, including the United States and Britain and its dominions, closed their doors to significant Jewish immigration. Palestine emerged as the only potential safe haven. In 1932, the British allowed 9,500 Jews to immigrate to Palestine. In 1933, the number shot up to 30,000, and in 1935, it peaked at 62,000.

But from 1933 onward, Palestine’s Arabs—led by the cleric Muhammad Haj Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem—mounted a strident campaign to pressure the British, who governed Palestine, to bar all Jews from entering the country. To press home their demand, in 1936 they launched an anti-British and anti-Zionist rebellion that lasted three years. Apart from throwing out the British, the rebellion’s aim was to coerce London into halting all Jewish entry into Palestine.

Moreover, the anti-Jewish violence, which claimed the lives of hundreds of Jews and wounded many more, itself served to deter would-be emigrants from seeking to move to Palestine. British entry certificates for Jews to Palestine declined to 30,000 in 1936, 10,000 in 1937, and 15,000 in 1938. Those who couldn’t get in were left stranded in Germany, Poland, Hungary, and elsewhere. Almost all died in the Holocaust, which the Germans unleashed in 1941.

But the Palestinians’ contribution to the Holocaust was also more direct. Husseini, having fled Palestine during the revolt, helped pro-Nazi generals launch an anti-British rebellion in Iraq in 1941 (which itself engendered a large-scale pogrom against Baghdad’s Jews, the Farhoud). When that rebellion failed, he fled to Berlin, where he was given a villa and a generous monthly salary, and lived in comfort until the end of the world war. During the war, he helped recruit Muslims from the Balkans for the German army and the SS, and in radio broadcasts exhorted Middle Eastern and North African Arabs to launch jihad against the British and “kill the Jews.” (The texts of Husseini’s broadcasts appear in the historian Jeffrey Herf’s book The Jewish Enemy.)

Subsequently, Husseini fled Germany and, with the Allies reluctant to trigger Arab anger by trying him for collaboration, settled down in Cairo. In 1947, he rejected the UN partition plan to settle the Palestine conflict and helped launch the first Palestinian and pan-Arab war against the Zionist enterprise. He spent his last years in Lebanon, embittered by the loss of Palestine and the pan-Arab failure to effectively support the Palestinians, and published a series of anti-Semitic articles before his death in 1974.

Go here to read the rest.  Of course mere facts will not deter Tlaib.  Why should she?  The reaction of the Democrat leadership in the House has been not to condemn her, but rather to condemn the Republicans who have pointed out the obvious mendacity of what Tlaib is peddling.  In the contemporary party of the Jackass you cannot be pro-life, but you can espouse a hatred of Israel and Jews.

More to explorer


  1. The contrast in the culture between the two political parties is inneresting. The Democrats are constitutionally incapable of criticizing even the most egregious statements and the Republican toss under the bus people whose remarks are merely infelicitous; Trump’s accession hasn’t changed the impulses of the Republican leadership (see Steve King).

  2. That’s because Republicans are forever seeking approval and Democrats know their entitled to it like some sort of birthright.

    It’ll be quite the day when Republican utterances are presumed legitimate and Democrat utterances are automatically subject to scrutiny.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: