Google: An Arm of the Democrat Party


Our Tech Lords favor a one party state.  From Project Veritas:

Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.  The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley.  These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies.  In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”

“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda.  Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:

Go here to read the rest.  Google execs should be indicted for campaign law violations..  They clearly are making massive undisclosed donations of immense value to the Democrats.


Update:  Well Google is not subtle:

BIG UPDATE: YouTube has REMOVED the video from their platform. The video is still available on this website page.
UPDATE 1: Congressman Louie Gohmert issued a statement, saying “Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped…”
UPDATE 2: Google executive Jen Gennai RESPONDED to the video, saying, “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.” 


Go here to read the rest, and to see the video that Youtube, which is owned by Google, pulled.  It is fortunate for those of us who treasure liberty that the Tech Lords are both arrogant and ham-handed.


More to explorer


  1. I assume an indictment would have to be sought in some location other than California, where I doubt there are enough trustworthy people to fill out a Federal grand jury.

  2. Google execs should be indicted for campaign law violations..

    Federal prosecutors get creative only when the scalps get them career advancement, psychic income, or a political object. I suspect Brin, Zuckerburg, (and Soros) are pretty safe (which Michael Cohen and Dinesh d’Souza were not). Of course, you need a judge-collaborator to get away with this sort of thing.

  3. If I remember correctly, which is a question in itself.

    If an outside organization coordinates with a political party in the presidential election, what they spend counts against that parties campaign spending limits

    The lawyer will get rich..

  4. Question: would any Republican candidate or campaign have standing to sue for an injunction? Federal judges have managed oversight of school districts and electoral district commissions for similar violations of the law. It would seem that a case could be made that the leaders of the social media cartel should now be operating under similar public oversight.

  5. Google is an evil One World totalitarian enterprise. It is a deathwork–a work of the devil. It must be destroyed.

  6. Another massive arm of the left and democrat party is public education – government-sponsored child abuse.

  7. Not a lawyer, but surely Google is therefore the largest campaign contributor to the DNC in existence, via the monetary value of free advertisement and the value of censured commentary. I would also wonder about criminal use of foreign influence and contributions via the monetary value of any commentary from out side the USA being against our laws etc. Am I totally wrong on this?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: