The Deep State Protects Its Own

Well, well, well:

 

According to Ingraham, she obtained a chain of State Department emails from May 2019 between New York Times journalist Ken Vogel and State Department official Kate Schilling, when Vogel was seeking comment on his story about the White House meeting between the whistleblower, Ukrainian officials, and the Obama administration.

In the email, Vogel wrote, “We are going to report that [State Department official] Elizabeth Zentos attended a meeting at the White House on 1/19/2016 with Ukrainian prosecutors and embassy officials as well as … [redacted] from the NSC … the subjects discussed included efforts within the United State government to support prosecutions, in Ukraine and the United Kingdom, of Burisma Holdings, … and concerns that Hunter Biden’s position with the company could complicate such efforts.”

Ingraham said this email was forwarded to Schilling’s colleagues Zentos and George Kent, who appears to have been a source for Vogel. The conversation ended on May 3, with the State Department declining to comment. Kent, who was stationed in Kyiv at the time, told House investigators during an impeachment hearing last year that he raised concerns in 2015 about Hunter Biden holding a position with Burisma but was rebuffed by a Joe Biden aide.

Using archived Obama White House visitor logs, Ingraham said her team was able to corroborate details of the January 2016 meeting, showing on the screen the names of Ukrainian officials checked into the White House by Ciaramella, who was Ukraine director on the National Security Council.

It’s previously been established that the Obama State Department had raised red flags” about Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma. But, the story about the White House meeting was never published and Ingraham reached out to Vogel and the New York Times to find out why.

 

Go here to read the rest.  Go here for more details. How much of The Resistance to Trump is a desperate effort to protect a very profitable web of corruption for members of the club, like Joe Biden and his drugged up son?

More to explorer

2 Comments

  1. “How much of The Resistance to Trump is a desperate effort to protect a very profitable web of corruption for members of the club, like Joe Biden and his drugged up son?”
    Darned near all of it, I would say, based on what’s been revealed in these past three years or so. It seems we all have been gaslighted, and so were our parents and maybe even their parents. This web likely includes most or all of every Executive Branch official, Member of Congress and Senator going back at least to WW-2, as well. How else to explain that all of them became wealthy from “government service”, or wealthier, in the cases of the many who already were part of the elite when they arrived in Washington? And don’t propose me for a member of the Tinfoil Hat brigade. A lot of smart and trustworthy people are seeing and reporting on these things.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: